Archive for July, 2008

Love Marriage Vs Arranged Marriage

First Love Marriage: Resembles procedural programming language. We have some set functions like flirting, going to movies together, making long conversations on phone and then try to fit all functions to the candidate we like.

It is a throwaway type of prototype as client requirements rises with time thus it is a dynamic system and difficult to maintain.

Family system hangs because hardware (called parents) is not responding.

You are the project leader so u are responsible for implementation and execution of PROJECT- married life.

Client expectations include exciting feature as spouse cooking food, washing clothes etc.

Acceptance test possible you can try before you Buy.

Love Marriage is like Windows, beautiful n seductive…. Yet one never knows when it will crash!

Now for the Arranged Marriage :Similar to object oriented programming approach. We first fix the candidate and then try to implement functions on her. The functions are added to supplement the main program. The functions can be added or deleted.

Requirements are well defined so use of waterfall model is possible

Compatible with hardware (Parents).

You are a team member under project leader (parents) so they are responsible for successful execution of project Married life.

All these features are covered in the SRS as required features.

Product is sold on an as is where is basis. Product once sold will not be taken back!

Arranged Marriage is like Unix… boring n colorless… still extremely reliable and robust.

I have a love affair for the past 11 years and I gonna prove all critics who say NO to LOVE marriage, WRONG!

Leave a comment »

What are you going to do? How are your going to add value?

“Your career is literally your business,” said, Theodore Levitt, author and educator.
These are challenging times … and tough times.
What makes the situation so much more difficult is the way people handle these tough times. Like others, the possibility of downsizing and company lay-offs is REAL.
The key question that each of us should be asking is: “What am I going to do?”
Be careful not to shift responsibility of job preservation or career enhancement on someone else. And that, my fellow agents, is a dangerous position to take. In “Choose Greatness For Your Life Today,” I read, “We must stop (seeking to blame) external people and forces in our lives and begin consciously choosing appropriate responses.”
So I ask you, are you taking responsibility for yourself, your job, and your future? Or are you simply sitting on the sidelines, hoping things work out? A call to action: Take responsibility for making good things happens.
As writer Sara Henderson says, “Don’t wait for a light to appear at the end of the tunnel. Stride down there … and light the bloody thing yourself.”
So what are the appropriate responses to these challenging, insecure times? (Here comes the “born” instructor in me…)
1. Focus on your replacement value?
*If you’re ever going to have control over your career, you must have an answer to each question. They are as follows:
a) What am I going to do to increase my value in the market place?
b) What am I going to do to demonstrably increase my value to my current employer? Or to my clients and customers?
c) What am I going to do to increase my value to prospective future employers?
d) What am I going to do to make myself so valuable that I’m the least likely to be cut or the last to be cut?
2. Stop the excuses
* “There are many who find a good alibi far more attractive than achievement.” These people will never turn into great success stories.
3. Refuse to settle for “good enough.”
*Focus on 5 things that will make you more valuable to your employer or your customers.

Michael

Leave a comment »

Effective Time Management

Ever feel that there is not enough time in the day to get things done? Do you often feel time-pressured? Have a problem with procrastination or figuring out how to prioritize your days? If you said yes to any of these questions, then you should know that you are not alone. You fall into the category of millions of people under time associated stress. Much of your stress can be alleviated through effective time management. Although you may feel that you are not a good manager of your time, there are strategies that you can learn and apply to your life in order to gain more control of the use of your time. Follow the following 6 tips and begin to live life like its smooth sailing!
Become a Great Writer
You’re probably asking yourself, ‘What in the world does being a writer have to do with time-management?” Well, that’s a great question and I’m glad that you asked. The answer is EVERYTING! Effective time management begins with planning your time, which means WRITING down your plans on paper. There is power in the pen! There are literally thousands of thoughts that race through your mind throughout the course of the day. In order to focus your time on what’s really important requires you to have something tangible to look at. That requires you to decide now to write down every task you will need to accomplish. This not only includes on the job tasks, but at home stuff also. Remember, write, write, and write!
Schedule Your Priorities
Effective time-management begins with scheduling and anticipating upcoming activities and events both personally and professionally. This is where goal setting will assist you enormously in prioritizing what is on your schedule of things to do. Setting written down goals will help you to differentiate between what is urgent and vital, what can be done now and what can wait.
Invest In a Planner
I find that a daily planner is a very effective tool in helping you to become a better manager of your time. I would suggest purchasing a weekly-at-a-glance planner and then write down everything you need to accomplish in it. I like the weekly planners as opposed to the daily planers because you can open it up and have your entire week in front of you at one time. You can simply transfer your already written down goals to your planner in addition to the on-the-job tasks that you must fulfill.
Write a “To Do” List
Sometimes you may have more on your plate than you’ve bargained for. Writing a “to do” list will help you to overcome your feelings of being overwhelmed. When you find yourself to be extremely busy or unexpected things pop up, take the time out the night before to write a “to do” list. Decide in order of priority what things you absolutely must get done and by what time. Write it down and do it.
Learn To Say “No”
This is a difficult task for some people. Some people do not want to be perceived as a non-team player or make others feel that are not important enough to do favors for. Trust me; your peace of mind is not worth sacrificing to appease others. Remember, you cannot be all things to all people and you cannot do everything that everyone asks you to do. That type of mentality will drive you to a nervous break down. Keep in mind that you are saying no to the request and not the person. Mature people can accept when you truthfully are not in a position to accept any additional projects at this time.
Learn To Delegate
There will be times in your life both on the job and off when you will need to enlist the assistance of others. This is simply wise decision making. When you simply have too much before you to do, consider what things you can pass on to others to do for you. Most people really do not have a problem giving a helping hand to others when the need arises. You are human and sometimes you have more to do than what is humanly possible. Utilize the services of others and by the same token, be ready to assist others in their time of need.
So there you have it folks, 6 tips to help you have more smooth sailing days. Utilize the suggestions and you will definitely be able to enjoy your time much more instead of wondering where time has gone without you feeling productive. Plan and prosper!

Comments (1) »

Mind Power: Tame your Mind to better Your Life

One of the more interesting aspects of the Law of Attraction is found in it’s teachings. Essentially, it teaches people how to think and not what to think. This process of learning how to think helps the practitioner to focus the mind. Many people discover that focusing the mind, helps improve their life.

The Secret that took the world by storm did a great job in introducing the universal Law of Attraction, and the possibility of anyone acquiring great material possessions. And there’s nothing wrong with that.

It’s not wrong to be well fed, well clothed, drive a nice car and live in a nice home. If you create a feeling of self that’s capable and worthy, you’ll attract what you want. You can take care of yourself as well as others.

The main points of the Law of Attraction are to be grateful for the things you have in your life. To improve your life by focusing your thoughts on the positive things instead of the negative.

There are many people that see the Law of Attraction as a deeply religious experience. Connecting them to others and to a higher power.

The numbers are just as large that consider the Law of Attraction spiritual but not religious. Religious or just spiritual, the results are the same: To change our way of life for the better through the change of our thinking.

Even if you consider the Law of Attraction as neither religious nor spiritual, the benefits are the same. You are what you think. Your thoughts are manifested into reality and you definitely wish to get the most out of life with the Law of Attraction.

Leave a comment »

Short cut To A Successful Marriage

As far as I could understand no one enters into marriage intending it to end. No one thinks that will happen to them.

You wanna be?

You wanna be?

Yet you’d have to be a supreme ostrich not to have some awareness of the odds of your marriage lasting “‘til death do you part.”

So here are a few keys to increase your chances of your marriage being one of the successful ones. (You know the kind: when the press asks you on your 80th anniversary, “What’s the secret of a successful marriage?”)

Successful Marriage Key 1 – Know Your Outcome.

Ideally, you should do this before you propose or accept the proposal, but it’s never too late to change!

Ask yourself, (not your beloved – yourself!), what kind of relationship suits you.

For example, whilst equality may be one of your ideals, if you’re scrupulously honest with yourself, are you actually naturally drawn to being dominant in other areas of your life?

If you’re bossy at the office, (even if you’re not the boss), the leader and motivator of your social group, it’s unlikely you’ll be happy being a mouse at home! If that’s your personality type, for you to have a successful marriage, choose a spouse who’s happy being led by you.

On the other hand, if you’re comfortable being the deputy, and you’re a great organizer as long as someone ’s told you how they want their filing cabinet sorted or their garden to look, then you don’t want a mousy partner if your marriage is to succeed.

Are you extrovert or introverted in nature? Are you optimistic or pessimistic? How resistant are you to change like moving house or career change?

Give yourself a personality workout. It’s these kind of characteristics far more than “interests in common” that make a couple compatible.

If you’re already well into a marriage by the time you read this, at least you know where to look, (inside yourself!), for where the causes of any struggle might lay. Once you get some clarity about this, have a really deep and honest conversation or ten with your spouse.

Successful Marriage Key 2 – Learn Each Other’s Language.

It has been said that only 7% of communication is verbal. The old chestnut of “my wife doesn’t understand me” – the almost cartoon excuse for an extra-marital affair – isn’t going to wash in the twenty first century.

The main reason that couples don’t understand each other is because they don’t know each other’s language. I’m not talking about what you say in words.

You each will have codes. Facial expressions, tones of voice and of course, codes of conduct. These are behaviors each of you will have grown up with. I know of at least one couple whose marriage suffered badly in the early days because whenever they argued the wife would leave the room, whilst the husband was yelling “Don’t you dare walk out on me!”

It turned out that he had grown up in a family who believed that no matter how big or bad the disagreement, you stayed until it was resolved. His wife, on the other hand, grew up in a family where it was considered the ultimate insult to dignity to be shouted at, and you simply didn’t stay in a room where that was going on.

Once they discovered this, they were able to at least come to some agreement about how to disagree!

Successful Marriage Key 3 – Dare to be honest.

It sounds simple but this can be the toughest one of all because every one of us has fears that if “you knew X about me, you wouldn’t like me.”

We all have them because no one gets through childhood without ever receiving some kind of message that parts of us are not perfect. We are reminded that it ’s rude not to say thank you, impolite to belch publicly and so on.

Then there are social, moral and religious codes that we are “obliged” to follow, not to mention legal rules. Most of us, at times, walk tightropes on some of these areas of life, and a few of us have even been known to cross the odd line from time to time. (No one I know ever has, of course! But I’ve heard the rumours).

But the more you are prepared to “psychologically unpack” with your nearest and dearest, the more you’ll build up trust between you, but there ’s a much more important result to this.

You’ll feel more loved, because you’ll discover that the parts of you that you yourself had thought unacceptable, even unlovable, are now accepted and cherished as part of you by the person who matters to you most.

In return, you’ll love her or him all the more for loving you.

Now who’d want to leave a marriage like that?

Leave a comment »

Its opposition to the deal is still a mystery

Inod-US Nuke deal

Inod-US Nuke deal

Bharatiya Janata Party’s opposition to the Indo-US nuclear deal has been and is still a mystery. The initiative for civil nuclear cooperation with the US was started by the BJP and the current deal is only an extension of that initiative.
The BJP’s opposition appears to be motivated more by the fact that the deal was completed by the Congress rather than any serious objections to the deal itself. If the BJP is a party with a difference, this is the time to prove it by looking at the deal in a larger framework of the national interest rather than by trying to score political debating points.

The BJP initially tried hard to nitpick on the details of the deal, but has recently focused on the right to test as the key issue, arguing that the deal would prevent India from conducting future tests. This is a false claim: nothing in the deal says that India cannot test.

There may be consequences if India tests, but even this has been minimized because under the conditions of the deal, the US will have to take into consideration whether India was forced to test because of circumstances such as nuclear tests by India’s neighbors. Moreover, if India conducts a test, it will have to face some international opposition irrespective of the signing the deal or not.

It should also be noted that the vast majority of the BJP’s constituency comes from the middle class, much of which supports the deal. The Left’s opposition to the deal may help it to solidify its base, but the BJP’s position is actually driving a wedge between the party and its core support base. Repeated statements from the BJP leaders that they have no objections to closer Indo-US ties only makes their position on the nuclear deal more confusing to their supporters.

Even Brajesh Mishra, the National Security Advisor of the Vajpayee government, and someone, who initially opposed the deal, has now endorsed it. But the BJP refuses to, arguing that while an individual could change positions on policy issues, a political party cannot.

This is stubbornness, not consistency. If it is truly a party with a difference, the BJP can start by proving it by changing their position on the nuclear deal.

Leave a comment »

Outsourcing Market In India

GetFriday, Bangalore

GetFriday, Bangalore

Businesses all over the world have seen the benefits of outsourcing. They have now realized that outsourcing is not just an option for survival but a tool that when used properly, will greatly benefit their businesses. And with India showing much talent and skills, it has become the favorite place of these businesses as an outsourcing destination.

India’s Outsourcing Revenue
India has revenues of US$10.9 billion from offshore outsourcing and US$30 billion from IT and total outsourcing (expected in FY 2008). India thus has some 5-6% share of the total Outsourcing Industry, but a commanding 63% share of the offshore component.
Why India?
Productivity and growth can somewhat be called the teaser benefits of outsourcing and the country at the number one spot that provides these two is India. All over the United States and the United Kingdom, India is the preferred destination for outsourcing assignments. In recent researches, forty four percent of the world’s offshore outsourcing back office and software services are in India. It has also been noted that as many as 400 of the Fortune 500 companies have their own branches in India or are outsourcing to India utilizing Indian technology companies.

Processing knowledge

Processing knowledge

What makes India such a hot spot for outsourcing jobs?

1. Skilled Labor – India has a myriad of skilled people that are very available in the country. The highly skilled work force in India provides not only high quality service but also other added services that are very valuable. An added advantage, which puts India on top of the list, is the ability of the people to speak in English. It boasts of being the 2nd largest nation to have the most number of English speaking citizens thus companies based in the United States or the United Kingdom opt for outsourcing in India.

2. Huge Labor Force – Because of this vast number, India can afford to trim down the cost of services without having to cut down on quality. Just by looking at the list of companies that have back office operations in India one will truly understand and believe this. Airlines such as Lufthansa and British Airways outsource their ticket reservation in India. HSBC and GE outsource accounting in India. Dell and Microsoft outsource research work in India. Standard Chartered has its full back office operations for its global business in India.

3. Government Support – Another reason why India is an outsourcing hot spot is because of its government policies. Because of the support it gives to the outsourcing industry in the country, the government and its policies have ensured the growth of outsourcing in India. As of today, its value as an outsourcing destination has reached high status.

4. Stable Democracy – The stable democracy that India has been experiencing for the last six decades gives India an advantage in the outsourcing industry. The country’s GDP rate of 9.2 percent, ever improving infrastructure and its status as a country that provides high quality of service, and rapidly developing technology makes it a hot spot destination for outsourcing.

5. Global Recognitions – Five Indian cities are among the top 10 global emerging outsourcing destinations with Chennai topping the list. Among the top 10 cities, Hyderabad is ranked at the second position followed by Pune (3rd), Kolkata (5th) and Chandigarh (9th).~~~~~

  • Tinto Michael
  • Leave a comment »

    An interesting Irony in Our Country

    Over 10 lakh tonnes of foodgrains worth several hundred crores of rupees, which could have fed over one crore hungry people for a year, were damaged in Food Corporation of India (FCI) godowns during the last one decade.
    The damages were suffered despite the FCI spending Rs 242 crore while trying to prevent any loss of foodgrains during storage. Ironically another 2.59 crore was spent just to dispose off the rotten foodgrains.
    These startling facts came in reply to a Right to Information (RTI) application filed by a Delhi resident. FCI informed that 10 lakh tonnes of foodgrain was damaged in the godowns of government owned agency, which is responsible for procurement and distribution of foodgrains across the country.
    The FCI informed that 1.83 lakh tonnes of wheat, 3.95 lakh tonnes of rice, 22 thousand tonnes of paddy and 110 tonnes of maize were damaged between 1997 to 2007.
    The FCI said in the northern region — UP, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh and Delhi — the damage incurred was seven lakh tonnes and the PSU spent Rs 87.15 crore to prevent the loss besides spending over Rs 60 lakh to dispose off the damaged foodgrain.
    Keeping in view the amount of money spent by the FCI for preservation of foodgrains in its godown, the quantum of damage is huge. Is it not a national shame?” the RTI applicant Dev Ashish Bhattacharya said.
    Similarly in eastern India — Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Orissa, Bihar, Jharkhand and West Bengal — the damage incurred was 1.5 tonnes of food grains while the FCI spent Rs 122 crore to prevent it from rotting. But the damaged lot was disposed off after spending another Rs 1.65 crore.
    In southern region — Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala– the damage incurred was 43,069.023 tonnes despite spending Rs 25 crore. This damaged foodgrain was disposed off after spending another Rs 34,867.
    While damage in Maharashtra and Gujarat mounted to 73,814 tonnes, the FCI spent Rs 2.78 crore to prevent the loss. However, this lot was also disposed off later at a cost of Rs 24 lakh.
    In Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the damage incurred was 23,323.57 tonnes of food grains and the amount spent to stop the damage was Rs 5.5 crore.
    The story was no different from other go-downs as the FCI spent Rs 10.64 lakh for disposing damaged food grains.
    “The data given by FCI seems manipulated. In case of Jharkhand, the food grain damage is 3,699 tonnes which is comparatively low than other states. But the money spent to dispose off the damage is Rs 1.4 crore, which is high when compared to the other states,” Sources say.

    Comments (1) »

    “A liberal overview on the relation between India and US”

    A strange situation of apparently contradictory facets marks the present phase of India’s relationship with the United States of America.
    Of late, there is a surfeit of talks about “shared values” ranging from commitment to democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. To this has been added in recent months, the government’s new economic policy which plays up private enterprise and underplays public sector—at least that’s how it has been taken in the USA. And the government, in the President’s Address to Parliament, has publicly acknowledged that the US Administration has been “supportive” of our endeavor to fight back the economic crisis—presumably in the IMF and the World Bank.
    This tilt towards the USA has been pronounced after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the superficial understanding that the world has become unipolar, that is, instead of two superpowers, we would now be under the thumb of one and only one superpower. With the wisdom that discretion is the better part of valor, there has appeared a conspicuous urge to cultivate the USA and to be on the right side of Washington. This was heightened by the American display of military power in the Gulf War.
    Our government’s response to certain US diplomatic moves betrayed a very superficial understanding of the basics of the US policy. For quite sometimes, there was a sense of elation that Washington now acknowledges India as a “significant regional power”, playing a leading role in South Asia. This was followed by the US officials volunteering to recognize Kashmir as being part of India and to give up its previous insistence on plebiscite to settle the Kashmir dispute. On the formal plane, this was of course a shift in the US position which, on the face of it, undermines the Pakistani claim on Kashmir.
    What is noteworthy is that in the very same period there has been a concerted campaign about the violation of human rights in Kashmir by the Indian security forces. In other words, a case was being built up with plenty of sophistication about India being unacceptable to the entire Kashmiri population in the Valley—and this might help to build up an alibi for UN mediation, maybe through the personal diplomacy of the UN Secretary-General, or a special envoy nominated by him, as was done in the case of Afghanistan. This view can of course be contested since it is reported that the US establishment now does not charge India of having been guilty of violation of human rights either in Punjab or in Kashmir. Could this possibly be a genuinely sincere assessment, or is it a tactical move, since it is known that the big powers cynically exploit the human rights question for purposes of political expediency? It is possible that the sop itself is a sort of quid pro quo extracted from India. Is this in return for the diplomatic recognition of Israel accorded by New Delhi, or for inveigling India to go in for nuclear non-proliferation even if it could not be persuaded to sign the NPT?
    The nuclear issue has become an obsession on the part of Washington. There is no serious urge for nuclear disarmament on the part of the USA. In such circumstances, this insistence on nuclear non-proliferation being imposed on the rest of the world amounts to Washington making a bid for using nuclear monopoly to establish its world hegemony. Unmistakably, the US approach to the nuclear question has a distinct touch of the White Man’s superiority—no worry if the nuclear weapons are in the possession of Russia, but it becomes a matter of worry if Kazakhstan retains the nuclear installation. There is all the worry in the world if India and Pakistan have the bomb or for that matter, Iran and Iraq, but no disquiet at all over Israel’s nuclear programme.
    With regard to Pakistan’s nuclear weapons preparedness, the US Administration uses it as leverage for pressure on India to sign at least a bilateral non-proliferation declaration. It is important to note that the Pakistan Foreign Secretary’s disclosure of Pakistan’s nuclear weapon capability came during his Washington visit, and this is being neatly suffixed by the stand that an Indian initiative for non-proliferation can help to persuade Pakistan also to abjure the nuclear weapon. The point to note, however, is that with all the threat of penalizing Pakistan for making the nuclear bomb, the US Administration itself has sanctioned the sale of conventional military weaponry to Pakistan.
    What is also rather extraordinary is that the Indian Government is telling the US Government to persuade two of our neighbors, China and Pakistan, to agree to nuclear non-proliferation. This is a job which New Delhi ought to take up on its own.
    In this background, one has to weigh the pros and cons of the emerging Indo-US cooperation in the field of defense. What is being held back from the public of this country is the full picture of this cooperation and its implications. There are many strange features of this cooperation which have rapidly grown in the last one year, particularly after the visit of our Army Chief, General Rodriguez, to the Pentagon. Could it be that this Pentagon yatra gave him ideas which he recently aired landing himself in hot waters in Parliament? It is amazing that the now famous Kicklighter proposals were agreed to without any political debate in Parliament or any consultation with leaders of other parties despite the fact that the ruling party itself does not command a majority in Parliament. What exactly is the role of the newly set-up Indo-US Army Steering Committee? It is said that this military cooperation would help the Indian side in getting familiar with the nature and operation of the hi-tech weapons used by the US in the Gulf War.
    Now we find that a joint Indo-US naval exercise will soon take place in the Indian Ocean. Oddly enough, our Prime Minister during his visit to Mauritius last week formally supported the island republic’s claim on the archipelago that includes Diego Garcia, now the biggest US military base in the Indian Ocean, which will certainly be involved in the proposed joint Indo-US naval exercise. Incidentally, it may be recalled that the Indian Navy did not have any such joint naval exercise with the Soviet Navy despite the fact that the Soviet cooperation towards the building up of the Indian Navy is of no mean order.

    Leave a comment »

    Any hope for an integrated future of South Asia as a whole?

    The politicians on the Indian side are well-known for their severely critical stand on many issues pertaining to the handling of the crisis in Punjab and Kashmir. In the understanding of the average newspaper reader in Bangalore, many of those who were responsible for arranging the meeting are highly critical of the role of the security forces in the Kashmir Valley and to that extent are not in the good books of the government and the ruling political establishment.

    In this background, the success of the get-together —as reflected in the coverage of the event in the Indian press—brings out the growing public urge in this country for an end to the angry confrontation that marks the official-level relations between the two neighbors in recent years. In short, one may venture to say that while at the official level the governments of the two countries have been drifting to an eyeball-to-eyeball acrimony, the popular mood is veering round towards a relationship of friendly neighborhood.

    In the deliberations of the meeting, obviously there were divergent perceptions, though these differences were not along the lines of the frontier that divides the two countries. Within the Indian side, there were different perceptions on how to handle the vexed nuclear question and how to go about settling the Kashmir crisis. Similar divergences could be discerned on the Pakistani side as well.

    It is therefore not surprising at all that there has been a tinge of disappointment when media reports from Pakistan were found to be critical of the deliberations of the New Delhi meet. The burden of the press criticisms in Pakistan has been that the stand of the New Delhi get-together has been such as would weaken the official stand of the Pakistan Government. In other words, the press critics in Pakistan seem to suggest that the friends from Pakistan who attended the New Delhi meeting should have dittoed only the official line of their government.

    This line of approach cuts at the very basis of the people-to-people initiative for bettering relations between the two neighboring countries. It is precisely because of the bitter deadlock which has beset the relations between the two governments that this people-to-people initiative has become significant, urging the public in both the countries not to lose hope but to strive harder to explore fresh avenues for mutual understanding. In other words, the message of the New Delhi convention—as was of the previous one at Lahore—has been a message of hope instead of the message of despair that comes out of the official postures of the two governments. Further, the message of hope and confidence that the people-to-people diplomacy has generated at the New Delhi meeting is expected to serve as a spur for bold and imaginative Indo-Pak diplomacy by the two governments. In the democratic set-up through which the governments of both the countries function today, the manifestation of the will of the public helps to refashion diplomacy to faithfully reflect that will of the people.

    This positive trend needs to be nurtured by all forces of democracy and peace in both the countries. Pakistan today is beset with serious problems of sectarian Shia-Sunni violence as has erupted on a large-scale at Karachi necessitating the imposition of emergency measures by the government. Further, the Afghan imbroglio has its inevitable repercussions on the body politic of Pakistan. The emergence of Taliban irredentists asserting armed fanaticism is bound to undermine the foundations of the democratic polity in Pakistan. The recent upsurge of bigotry in the name of Islam, as demonstrated over the case of the Christian youngster charged with blasphemy of Islam, is an ominous signal which the courageous band of human rights activists in Pakistan have boldly sought to thwart. In this case too, the fact that a negative development is being resisted by the positive elements is a sign of democratic assertion.

    Much the similar task faces the adherents of democracy in India as well. The fanatic move of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and the Bajrang Dal to attack the mosque at Varanasi has been thwarted by timely action on the part of the administration backed by the overwhelming public disapproval of the insane move. What is particularly heartening in this episode is the bold and unequivocal condemnation of the VHP stand by BJP leader Atal Behari Vajpayee. Not only as the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament, has Mr Vajpayee commanded eminence as a national leader by his wise and statesman-like stand. It is worth recalling that Mr Vajpayee was the one BJP leader who unhesitatingly disapproved the demolition of the Babri Masjid by the fanatic fringe of his own party in 1992. It may further be noted that when he was the Foreign Minister in the Janata Party Government in 1977-79, the Indo-Pak relations showed definite signs of improvement largely at his initiative.

    In the midst of gloom all around, one can detect unmistakable streaks of sunshine in Indo-Pak relations. Here lies hope for the future of South Asia as a whole.

    Michael

    Leave a comment »